Open support of the Affordable Care Act (ACA) in Republican
circles is as close as you get to political blasphemy as it comes. But why is this? Is it solely because of the expansion of the
federal government? Funding a law that
we can’t afford? Or is it simply party
politics? The reason differs amongst
many Republicans, from centrists to Tea Party members. One thing we can all agree on is that
healthcare needs work and the ACA isn’t the answer. Now is a time that the Republicans can
position themselves as the solution.
They can do this if they change the framework of the argument. The Republicans need to change the
conversation about healthcare reform in a way that most aligns with the
conservative movement. The argument needs
to focus on how double digit increases in healthcare costs destroy the possibility
of fiscal conservatism in all levels of government.
In the 2014 budget for the City of Pittsburgh, funds for
employee benefits increased by 7.5% which is roughly $10.7 million. This is the only part of the budget that saw
such a substantial increase in the allocation of funds. Our city is by no means in a Detroit’esque
situation, but we are also not in a position to be spending frivolously. Aggregate wages for the region did not
increase 7.5% across the board, so it’s quite obvious the taxable base will not
grow to the point of this being a revenue neutral increase. Annual increases of this magnitude are not
sustainable and poorly allocate funds away from revenue growing projects like
new construction and infrastructure. The
city is living hand to mouth, and this is partly attributed to egregious
increases in healthcare costs.
One would hope that this unfortunate misallocation of funds
would be isolated to just the city budget, but it gets worse. The 2013 Pittsburgh Public School Budget saw
an increase in actual expenditures of 13% in employee benefits year to year
from 2012, promptly followed by a 7.8% increase in 2013 expenditures to the
2014 budget. That translates to roughly
a $16.7 million increase in two years! Think
about how tremendous it would be if those funds were allocated to renovating
our schools, purchasing new books and computers, and even increasing compensation
for our teachers. If accomplished, the
relationship between decreasing the cost of healthcare and more adequately
funding our schools can be a game changer in the current political arena for
whichever party can properly execute.
These two examples demonstrate the importance of healthcare
reform. These are just two examples, in
just one city. Cities, states, and
school districts all across the country are experiencing similar and in some
cases more severe budgetary constraints.
If we can’t curb this trend and find a way to decrease the cost of
healthcare, then we are signing ourselves up for a generation of even higher
taxes and an even more dysfunctional government. If you believe in fiscal conservatism, then
it’s imperative that you support healthcare reform that goes deeper than what
the ACA claims it will do. This is the
only way we can keep the lights on in our schools, and maintain the solvency of
our government.
No comments:
Post a Comment